Guys,
Here's a film I've been trying, literally, to find for years; I've finally found it! I remember seeing this film when I was teenager, and I never, ever forgot it. Since finding it on YouTube, I've watched it all the way through once, and I expect I will do so again. As the narrator says in the beginning of the documentary, this truly WAS one of the most incredible films I have ever seen; if it hadn't been, why would I remember it 37 years later?
Please keep in mind that this film was made in 1976, which is why the computer technology, to put it politely, is archaic bordering on ancient. Nevertheless, it's a good film about one of mankind's most enduring stories, and it brings forth evidence that we seldom, if ever, are told. For example, did you know that there have been numerous sightings of the ark on Mount Ararat? There have been.
Without any further ado, enjoy the film, In Search of Noah's Ark...
19 May 2013
13 May 2013
Leo Tolstoy's Thoughts on Marriage
Guys,
I was reading more of the "Fu*$ked Company" thread (excerpts of which Happyghost posted on the MGTOW forum) when I saw these quotes by Leo Tolstoy. Looks like marriage has been a big risk for men for a long, long time...
-----------------
"Tie yourself up with a woman, and like a chained convict, you lose all freedom . . . If you only know what women in general are! Egotism, vanity, silliness, triviality in everything. That's what women are when they show themselves as they really are...No, don't marry, my dear friend. Don't marry!"
--- Leo Tolstoy, "War and Peace"
"Women are generally stupid, but the devil lends her brains when she works for him. Then she accomplishes miracles of thinking, farsightedness, constancy, in order to do something
nasty."
--- Leo Tolstoy 1898
------------------
The last quote was from 1898. As I said, marriage is a big, big risk for men, and it has been for a long, long time. Oh well, feminism LIBERATED us from that-yes! Until next time...
MarkyMark
I was reading more of the "Fu*$ked Company" thread (excerpts of which Happyghost posted on the MGTOW forum) when I saw these quotes by Leo Tolstoy. Looks like marriage has been a big risk for men for a long, long time...
-----------------
"Tie yourself up with a woman, and like a chained convict, you lose all freedom . . . If you only know what women in general are! Egotism, vanity, silliness, triviality in everything. That's what women are when they show themselves as they really are...No, don't marry, my dear friend. Don't marry!"
--- Leo Tolstoy, "War and Peace"
"Women are generally stupid, but the devil lends her brains when she works for him. Then she accomplishes miracles of thinking, farsightedness, constancy, in order to do something
nasty."
--- Leo Tolstoy 1898
------------------
The last quote was from 1898. As I said, marriage is a big, big risk for men, and it has been for a long, long time. Oh well, feminism LIBERATED us from that-yes! Until next time...
MarkyMark
10 May 2013
A Natural Player
Guys,
I was going through some of my old Mancoat posts in search of posting material. After all, I posted a lot of good stuff before starting this blog; that, and I couldn't leave my with & wisdom buried-ha! Anyway, here's SquarePeg telling us about his uncle, a natural player if there ever were one...
----------------
You all know the story of how I got BBD'd, and how it drove me to this forum.
So I was telling my uncle this story he says I don't know how to deal with women and that's why it happened. Which is true to a certain extent but perhaps not as much as he implied.
Anyway, him and I are complete opposites, and his life story perfectly illustrates how players work and how dumb women are (because they act on their basic emotions and have no long-term thinking ability):
Me: 26, never had a woman. Responsible, not overweight, successful, well-paying job, good education, treats women with respect, not a player.
Him: 35, has four different children from four different women. And these women weren't exactly trash either...one of them has a PhD, and all of them are average or above average looking. Now, he's living with woman #5 and she is working 12 hours a day to pay his rent and pay for his car. He has no education, been evicted from several different apartments, been arrested for domestic abuse (although he's not a criminal), is hated by all the mothers of all of his children, swears at his mother, has an extreme victim mentality and never accepts responsibility for his actions, very poor with money (doesn't have a job yet asking me which plasma TV he should buy with his government assistance). He has never held down a real job for more than a couple months in his entire life. He is overweight and has no eating discipline.
Point being, women gravitate towards guys like him, they think he is a good guy to be with and they dump their current boyfriends for him. When he talks to women, he comes off as "funny", "smooth", and "charming", causing them to completely ignore the fact that his is not an honorable man. He is a smooth talker and a master bullshitter, and gullible women (sometimes even my mom) fall for his garbage with ease. I am left to conclude that 99.9% of women fall for facade, game, and gimmick, instead of quality.
Is this what we must become in order to get women? What the hell is wrong with this system? This proves unequivocally that women do not care about quality, they only respond to the tactics of players. Or more accurately, only men who are skilled at making women feel emotionally attracted to them will get women. And these are the very men who are least likely to make good husbands and fathers. (taken from THE RULES)
He swears up and down that what he does is not a game, he's just "being himself". Which in a way may be true in the sense that these tactics are so ingrained in him that they are subconscious and he is not aware when he is manipulating female emotions through specific actions, postures, ways of speech, and words. Nevertheless, whatever one wishes to call it, he has it, and he can bag women left and right.
When I tell this story to my mom and my sister, they give the typical "Oh, but look at the kind of women he gets. You don't want those kind of women!". That's nonsense. The women he gets are normal women. They are the same as all the others. This "you don't want to attract those kind of girls" line, I believe, is simply a tactic women use to make themselves feel better than other women. When in fact, 99.9% of women would fall for his games.
Damn
-----------
Guys, it's like I always say: chicks do NOT want a good man; they want the worst scumbag that they can find! That's who gets their panties hot & wet, not being a gentleman. Until next time...
MarkyMark
I was going through some of my old Mancoat posts in search of posting material. After all, I posted a lot of good stuff before starting this blog; that, and I couldn't leave my with & wisdom buried-ha! Anyway, here's SquarePeg telling us about his uncle, a natural player if there ever were one...
----------------
You all know the story of how I got BBD'd, and how it drove me to this forum.
So I was telling my uncle this story he says I don't know how to deal with women and that's why it happened. Which is true to a certain extent but perhaps not as much as he implied.
Anyway, him and I are complete opposites, and his life story perfectly illustrates how players work and how dumb women are (because they act on their basic emotions and have no long-term thinking ability):
Me: 26, never had a woman. Responsible, not overweight, successful, well-paying job, good education, treats women with respect, not a player.
Him: 35, has four different children from four different women. And these women weren't exactly trash either...one of them has a PhD, and all of them are average or above average looking. Now, he's living with woman #5 and she is working 12 hours a day to pay his rent and pay for his car. He has no education, been evicted from several different apartments, been arrested for domestic abuse (although he's not a criminal), is hated by all the mothers of all of his children, swears at his mother, has an extreme victim mentality and never accepts responsibility for his actions, very poor with money (doesn't have a job yet asking me which plasma TV he should buy with his government assistance). He has never held down a real job for more than a couple months in his entire life. He is overweight and has no eating discipline.
Point being, women gravitate towards guys like him, they think he is a good guy to be with and they dump their current boyfriends for him. When he talks to women, he comes off as "funny", "smooth", and "charming", causing them to completely ignore the fact that his is not an honorable man. He is a smooth talker and a master bullshitter, and gullible women (sometimes even my mom) fall for his garbage with ease. I am left to conclude that 99.9% of women fall for facade, game, and gimmick, instead of quality.
Is this what we must become in order to get women? What the hell is wrong with this system? This proves unequivocally that women do not care about quality, they only respond to the tactics of players. Or more accurately, only men who are skilled at making women feel emotionally attracted to them will get women. And these are the very men who are least likely to make good husbands and fathers. (taken from THE RULES)
He swears up and down that what he does is not a game, he's just "being himself". Which in a way may be true in the sense that these tactics are so ingrained in him that they are subconscious and he is not aware when he is manipulating female emotions through specific actions, postures, ways of speech, and words. Nevertheless, whatever one wishes to call it, he has it, and he can bag women left and right.
When I tell this story to my mom and my sister, they give the typical "Oh, but look at the kind of women he gets. You don't want those kind of women!". That's nonsense. The women he gets are normal women. They are the same as all the others. This "you don't want to attract those kind of girls" line, I believe, is simply a tactic women use to make themselves feel better than other women. When in fact, 99.9% of women would fall for his games.
Damn
-----------
Guys, it's like I always say: chicks do NOT want a good man; they want the worst scumbag that they can find! That's who gets their panties hot & wet, not being a gentleman. Until next time...
MarkyMark
07 May 2013
Chris in Oregon's Thoughts on America's Loss of Men
Guys,
Many of us have said that Christopher in Oregon should have his own blog, and this post will show us why. In this post, which was a comment to a post I made long ago, Chris talks about how & why America has lost its manhood. His comment was in response to a question I had for Anna's comment about America losing her men. I asked how so, since I wasn't sure of what she'd meant. Chris answered my question, and he did so powerfully & persuasively. Chris, my friend, I hope you get your own blog one of these days...
---------------
MarkyMark;
America IS losing its men, and through a number of different ways. Many men have been emasculated by society and/or their wives/mothers. Many men have retreated from women and responsibilities after having been shafted by their wives. Many other men, like both you and I, have simply withdrawn, and live for ourselves even though we never married.
Men increasingly no longer take any interest in what happens to our society, and even less when it comes to family and wives. There has been a fundamental withdrawing of men from their traditional roles, and it's only going to become more pronounced. Soon, women will only have the government to turn to, as men will have all but completely walked away.
Traditionally, American men have always been patriotic. If we felt there was a threat to our country, we usually willingly fought to protect our society, and our families from any external threat.
I was discussing war and the military and the like with some conservative friends of mine recently. The question was asked, more or less, "Since feminism changed our society completely, which of us would be willing to fight in the military to defend the U.S.?"
(Or, as Makow put it recently, "Would you take a bullet for a feminist?")
Funny thing. We're all gun-toting, traditional conservatives, and a pretty rational, sober lot of thinkers. All of us started laughing, and the conversation got real serious fast. We all agreed that because women, and also the state and the church, have turned against men so viciously, none of us would be willing to lay down our lives to fight for the U.S.
We all made comments along the lines that we felt the U.S. should just rot, and women should enjoy the fruits of their labors. In other words, let women fight the next war. The conversation was pretty sobering. Every one of us said, essentially, "Fuck women. Let them take care of themselves."
Yeah, let them take care of themselves indeed! After all, women have been crowing about how they can do anything a man can do, and do it better, etc.
Twenty years ago, this type of talk would never have gotten off the ground. I would never have talked that way, either. Women will never realize what they have lost until it's too late, and it's too late now.
I know what you mean how, twenty years ago, how such talk would never have gotten off the ground. We would have been ASHAMED to talk that way; it would have been heresy! I never would have talked that way, either, Chris. That said, that's how I feel; I couldn't give damn about women anymore. If they're not blood relatives or one of the FEW decent women I know, then they can rot in hell as far as I'm concerned...
I have to commute around town quite often by bus, and we also have a very extensive light rail and street car system, as well. It never ceases to amaze me how rarely men allow women to board the train or bus first, and how they almost never offer their seats to women, ESPECIALLY the younger (under 40ish) ones. I was raised to always be chivalrous, and I still marvel at the changes in men. So often the women, young and old, look so bewildered when men push past them to grab a seat. Nobody seems to care.
I never offer my seat to women anymore, either; even if she's pregnant, I won't offer my seat. Why do so, when she probably got knocked up by some bad boy? Why give up a seat to her, when she'd probably SPIT at a good guy who surrendered his seat for her? She probably views such conduct as weakness anyway?
If I were to see a REAL lady, then I might be inclined to offer my seat to her. Then again, real ladies have gone the way of the Dodo bird; they're all but extinct now. What is a lady? For me, it's like pornography; I know one when I SEE one. Since we men should want to reinforce good behavior amongst women, then we should reward them for it-though it rarely happens these days...
Ah, well. This is just the beginning. Do you remember that mass murder that took place at a University in Canada in '89, I believe, when the killer told all of the men, both students and faculty, to leave the room, and then proceeded to kill most of the female students. Interesting stuff. None of the men made any attempt to protect the women, and ALL of them just walked away knowing the women were going to be killed. Makow wrote about that recently.
I believe you're referring to Marc Lepine. Well, women said that they no longer wanted those brutish, masculine, sexist, chauvinist pigs, right? They said that they wanted us to be sensitive, new age guys, didn't they? Seems to me like they got what they said they wanted...
Fascinating.
Ah, well. Women are just beginning to reap the benefits of their freedom. What does the Bible say about reaping what you sow....?
Galatians 6:7 says: "Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap."
Just wait, ladies, until men go from being indifferent about your plight to hating you. My, oh, my. Now, THAT should be entertaining.
Yes, it WILL be entertaining! I will be rejoicing with much schadenfreude as this unfolds...
Kinda sucks, eh?
Not really-not when bitches will be getting their just deserts...
Christopher in Oregon
---------------
That was a good post, and I enjoyed interspersing my thoughts amongst Chris'...
MarkyMark
Many of us have said that Christopher in Oregon should have his own blog, and this post will show us why. In this post, which was a comment to a post I made long ago, Chris talks about how & why America has lost its manhood. His comment was in response to a question I had for Anna's comment about America losing her men. I asked how so, since I wasn't sure of what she'd meant. Chris answered my question, and he did so powerfully & persuasively. Chris, my friend, I hope you get your own blog one of these days...
---------------
MarkyMark;
America IS losing its men, and through a number of different ways. Many men have been emasculated by society and/or their wives/mothers. Many men have retreated from women and responsibilities after having been shafted by their wives. Many other men, like both you and I, have simply withdrawn, and live for ourselves even though we never married.
Men increasingly no longer take any interest in what happens to our society, and even less when it comes to family and wives. There has been a fundamental withdrawing of men from their traditional roles, and it's only going to become more pronounced. Soon, women will only have the government to turn to, as men will have all but completely walked away.
Traditionally, American men have always been patriotic. If we felt there was a threat to our country, we usually willingly fought to protect our society, and our families from any external threat.
I was discussing war and the military and the like with some conservative friends of mine recently. The question was asked, more or less, "Since feminism changed our society completely, which of us would be willing to fight in the military to defend the U.S.?"
(Or, as Makow put it recently, "Would you take a bullet for a feminist?")
Funny thing. We're all gun-toting, traditional conservatives, and a pretty rational, sober lot of thinkers. All of us started laughing, and the conversation got real serious fast. We all agreed that because women, and also the state and the church, have turned against men so viciously, none of us would be willing to lay down our lives to fight for the U.S.
We all made comments along the lines that we felt the U.S. should just rot, and women should enjoy the fruits of their labors. In other words, let women fight the next war. The conversation was pretty sobering. Every one of us said, essentially, "Fuck women. Let them take care of themselves."
Yeah, let them take care of themselves indeed! After all, women have been crowing about how they can do anything a man can do, and do it better, etc.
Twenty years ago, this type of talk would never have gotten off the ground. I would never have talked that way, either. Women will never realize what they have lost until it's too late, and it's too late now.
I know what you mean how, twenty years ago, how such talk would never have gotten off the ground. We would have been ASHAMED to talk that way; it would have been heresy! I never would have talked that way, either, Chris. That said, that's how I feel; I couldn't give damn about women anymore. If they're not blood relatives or one of the FEW decent women I know, then they can rot in hell as far as I'm concerned...
I have to commute around town quite often by bus, and we also have a very extensive light rail and street car system, as well. It never ceases to amaze me how rarely men allow women to board the train or bus first, and how they almost never offer their seats to women, ESPECIALLY the younger (under 40ish) ones. I was raised to always be chivalrous, and I still marvel at the changes in men. So often the women, young and old, look so bewildered when men push past them to grab a seat. Nobody seems to care.
I never offer my seat to women anymore, either; even if she's pregnant, I won't offer my seat. Why do so, when she probably got knocked up by some bad boy? Why give up a seat to her, when she'd probably SPIT at a good guy who surrendered his seat for her? She probably views such conduct as weakness anyway?
If I were to see a REAL lady, then I might be inclined to offer my seat to her. Then again, real ladies have gone the way of the Dodo bird; they're all but extinct now. What is a lady? For me, it's like pornography; I know one when I SEE one. Since we men should want to reinforce good behavior amongst women, then we should reward them for it-though it rarely happens these days...
Ah, well. This is just the beginning. Do you remember that mass murder that took place at a University in Canada in '89, I believe, when the killer told all of the men, both students and faculty, to leave the room, and then proceeded to kill most of the female students. Interesting stuff. None of the men made any attempt to protect the women, and ALL of them just walked away knowing the women were going to be killed. Makow wrote about that recently.
I believe you're referring to Marc Lepine. Well, women said that they no longer wanted those brutish, masculine, sexist, chauvinist pigs, right? They said that they wanted us to be sensitive, new age guys, didn't they? Seems to me like they got what they said they wanted...
Fascinating.
Ah, well. Women are just beginning to reap the benefits of their freedom. What does the Bible say about reaping what you sow....?
Galatians 6:7 says: "Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap."
Just wait, ladies, until men go from being indifferent about your plight to hating you. My, oh, my. Now, THAT should be entertaining.
Yes, it WILL be entertaining! I will be rejoicing with much schadenfreude as this unfolds...
Kinda sucks, eh?
Not really-not when bitches will be getting their just deserts...
Christopher in Oregon
---------------
That was a good post, and I enjoyed interspersing my thoughts amongst Chris'...
MarkyMark
06 May 2013
Review of Confessions of an Online Hustler
Guys,
Matt Forney was kind enough to send me a copy of his book, Confessions of an Online Hustler: How to Make Money & Become an Internet Superstar, for review. His book, if followed, WILL enable you to make money online. However, Mr. Forney doesn't blow sunshine up your ass and say it'll be easy, either; if anything, he lays out just how much effort it'll take to become an Internet superstar. Hint: it'll be a lot, and it'll probably take a few attempts before you become successful.
He then recounts Roosh V's history. Did you know that he's had at least two or three previous blogs? I didn't! I just thought he'd always had his present site, RooshV. He largely uses RooshV as an example of how to make money online, and why not? He was one of the first and still is one of the best at doing so, so it only makes sense to study Roosh's example.
One thing I really liked about his book is that I found myself laughing constantly; this is one entertaining read. For example, in the intro section, he says on page 5: "In my years of blogging and lurking, I've watched sites come and go like herpes sores." I laughed my ass off when I read that!
That said, the book isn't all fun & games; it's very much a how-to manual about making money online. Unlike many self help books though, Mr. Forney isn't overly condescending or upbeat. He just lays out what to do, how to do it, when, with whom, etc. For example, he has an entire section juxtaposting Blogger vs. Wordpress. He has another section on which hosting service is best, which one permits the most freedom, etc. He tells you all about this, so you won't have to find out on your own, wasting precious time and effort; that alone makes the book worth the price.
However (and Matt makes no bones about this), the book won't teach you about HTML or CSS. He does though point you to excellent resources that will teach you the aforementioned languages, but he doesn't cover them himself. Mr. Forney says (and I agree) that you don't have to know HTML to do a blog; all you need is a few basics, which is all I've ever needed over the years doing this site. Knowing some basics can help you troubleshoot a formatting problem, say when a line of text won't print where you want it to.
What I liked best about the book is this: it'll answer the question for you about whether or not you want to make money online; are you really willing to do what it takes? For me, the answer is no. I started this blog with the intent of saying things about men's issues that others weren't saying. Back then, the major Manosphere heavyweight was Eternal Bachelor; if he and his contemporaries didn't comment on something, then I'd have a go at it. My desire is still the same; I wish to comment on things others aren't saying, or to say them in a way no one else is saying them. I was never about making money; all I wanted to do was vent my thoughts online, share them with other people, and influence a few of them in the process. I have, so that's enough for me.
In closing, if you want to be an Internet superstar, Matt Forney's book, Confessions of an Online Hustler, will show you how to do it; he provides an excellent road map to do this, so you don't have to waste time stumbling about trying to find your way. He doesn't say it'll be easy to make money online; if anything, Mr. Forney does an excellent job of highlighting how much WORK you'll have to put in to make it happen. This is a great self-help book, one that is both serious and entertaining; you'll learn and laugh at the same time! Even if you never start a blog but want to learn more about it, the book is an excellent read. Most importantly, it'll help you figure out: 1) if you really want to make money online; 2) if you're willing to do what it takes (and it'll take plenty); 3) how to do it. I would urge everyone here to read Matt Forney's excellent book; it'll be time well spent. Thanks, and have a nice day!
MarkyMark
Matt Forney was kind enough to send me a copy of his book, Confessions of an Online Hustler: How to Make Money & Become an Internet Superstar, for review. His book, if followed, WILL enable you to make money online. However, Mr. Forney doesn't blow sunshine up your ass and say it'll be easy, either; if anything, he lays out just how much effort it'll take to become an Internet superstar. Hint: it'll be a lot, and it'll probably take a few attempts before you become successful.
He then recounts Roosh V's history. Did you know that he's had at least two or three previous blogs? I didn't! I just thought he'd always had his present site, RooshV. He largely uses RooshV as an example of how to make money online, and why not? He was one of the first and still is one of the best at doing so, so it only makes sense to study Roosh's example.
One thing I really liked about his book is that I found myself laughing constantly; this is one entertaining read. For example, in the intro section, he says on page 5: "In my years of blogging and lurking, I've watched sites come and go like herpes sores." I laughed my ass off when I read that!
That said, the book isn't all fun & games; it's very much a how-to manual about making money online. Unlike many self help books though, Mr. Forney isn't overly condescending or upbeat. He just lays out what to do, how to do it, when, with whom, etc. For example, he has an entire section juxtaposting Blogger vs. Wordpress. He has another section on which hosting service is best, which one permits the most freedom, etc. He tells you all about this, so you won't have to find out on your own, wasting precious time and effort; that alone makes the book worth the price.
However (and Matt makes no bones about this), the book won't teach you about HTML or CSS. He does though point you to excellent resources that will teach you the aforementioned languages, but he doesn't cover them himself. Mr. Forney says (and I agree) that you don't have to know HTML to do a blog; all you need is a few basics, which is all I've ever needed over the years doing this site. Knowing some basics can help you troubleshoot a formatting problem, say when a line of text won't print where you want it to.
What I liked best about the book is this: it'll answer the question for you about whether or not you want to make money online; are you really willing to do what it takes? For me, the answer is no. I started this blog with the intent of saying things about men's issues that others weren't saying. Back then, the major Manosphere heavyweight was Eternal Bachelor; if he and his contemporaries didn't comment on something, then I'd have a go at it. My desire is still the same; I wish to comment on things others aren't saying, or to say them in a way no one else is saying them. I was never about making money; all I wanted to do was vent my thoughts online, share them with other people, and influence a few of them in the process. I have, so that's enough for me.
In closing, if you want to be an Internet superstar, Matt Forney's book, Confessions of an Online Hustler, will show you how to do it; he provides an excellent road map to do this, so you don't have to waste time stumbling about trying to find your way. He doesn't say it'll be easy to make money online; if anything, Mr. Forney does an excellent job of highlighting how much WORK you'll have to put in to make it happen. This is a great self-help book, one that is both serious and entertaining; you'll learn and laugh at the same time! Even if you never start a blog but want to learn more about it, the book is an excellent read. Most importantly, it'll help you figure out: 1) if you really want to make money online; 2) if you're willing to do what it takes (and it'll take plenty); 3) how to do it. I would urge everyone here to read Matt Forney's excellent book; it'll be time well spent. Thanks, and have a nice day!
MarkyMark
04 May 2013
AF on Religion & Morals as Constraints on Human Conduct
Guys,
Recently, there was a good piece on The Spearhead about how girls are going absolutely GAGA over Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, aka the Boston Bomber. The post is good, and I would encourage you all to read it; then the comment that follows will make more sense. While there were a lot of good comments, a chap by the name of AF nailed it-just nailed it. Here's his comment, with a thought or two from me...
---------------
This is precisely why “never worship false idols” is such good advice.
I’m not Christian, before anyone starts quoting the Bible at me again, but I can see quite clearly that when culture swapped from worshipping divine and therefore perfect images, e.g. Gods, saints, angels etc, and went instead to worshipping human and therefore flawed creatures, e.g. celebrities, rich people, “hot” members of the opposite sex, everything went to hell.
Part of the social engineering plan of the last 50 years or so has been to scrap religion, and to instead idealise and worship sex, relationships and sexually attractive people, to the extent we are encouraged to see these things as almost mystical, transcendental. The overriding message we hear again and again and again is “hot woman + hot man + hot sex = astonishing transformational happiness.”
There is no longer any emphasis on aspiring to anything higher than base physicality. Man as a spiritual creature with higher ideals has been extinguished. We are taught to find our meaning and higher purpose through other, equally imperfect and flawed, human beings, and it doesn’t work.
What you say about the nature of women is more or less true. But then, men have morally questionable lusts too. Women may be attracted to violent men because violence connotes power, and men may be attracted to 15-year-old girls, because youth connotes fertility. Are either of these things morally impressive? No. But they’re just a fact of life, which make perfect sense from an evolutionary standpoint.
The fact human nature can often be base and amoral is really irrelevant. “Nature” is given too much credence where it comes to sex. So we’re attracted to unsuitable people, so what? It doesn’t mean we have to do anything about it. The whole point of civilization and of human intelligence is for people to control and channel natural impulses in a way that is most beneficial to them and to their families, society and culture, This represents what most cultures call morality. Living a moral life is and has always been recognised as hard and a struggle – if it were easy, all the major religions wouldn’t have spent so much time trying to control and enforce it.
This brings us to the vital crux of the situation we’re in now; our culture has become morally insane. We have stopped imposing moral limits on anyone’s behaviour, specifically their sexual behaviour, as this would be “oppressive” and “intolerant”. Instead, we practise and preach ‘safe sex’ – which basically means you can behave as immorally as you like, provided it is sterile and hygienic.
Nobody wants to accept that there is an important dimension to sexual behaviour above and beyond the physical ramifications. Nobody wants to confront the notion that doing whatever you like sexually is not okay and is profoundly destructive, even if you don’t get syphilis or an unwanted kid.
Everyone is terrified of stating: “you shouldn’t do this because it’s wrong”. That’s why unfettered sexual licence shouldn’t exist; not because of unplanned pregnancies, not because of diseases, but because it’s wrong; and a first-class ticket to an unseamed and insane culture.
Ah, but to say that something is wrong is to be 'judgmental', and that's bad. Never mind the fact that those shouting the 'judgmental' epithet are being judgmental themselves! Ah, the hypocrisy of libtards never ceases to amaze me...
Other posters have suggested that men used to idealise women to enable them to commit and work hard to support the family. This is absolutely wrong. Men committed to women and supported families because it was widely recognised and understood as being the right thing to do, the moral thing to do. This is the same reason women committed. Plus, both sexes had to demonstrate the skills and practical applications to be a good spouse – a job and means to support a family if you were a man, and homemaking skills if you were a woman. Both parties had to be considered to be “of good character” by the other’s family. People couldn’t get married simply because they thought the other one was “hot” or because they were “in love”, as it is now. They had to prove themselves.
This is was the 'social contract' that once existed...
Can anyone honestly think men in the past never argued with their wives, never got annoyed with them, never lusted after anyone else, even after decades of marriage and several kids? Of course they did. Husbands and wives didn’t idealise each other; that is very much a modern invention, necessary after we scrapped religion and God. Any ancient text, be it religious, philosophical or whatever has elucidated again and again the imperfections of mankind and the imperfect ways in which the sexes relate. The point is to find the arrangements that work best.
As I said, the point isn’t what men and women’s “nature” may or may not be. The point is for society as a whole to set moral standards and expect people to adhere to them, with penalties if they don’t. We have given up setting any moral standards, therefore we have given up having a viable culture based on healthy relations between the sexes.
-----------------
I thought that was good stuff, so I shared it with my readers. Stay tuned; there are more posts on the way! Until next time...
MarkyMark
Recently, there was a good piece on The Spearhead about how girls are going absolutely GAGA over Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, aka the Boston Bomber. The post is good, and I would encourage you all to read it; then the comment that follows will make more sense. While there were a lot of good comments, a chap by the name of AF nailed it-just nailed it. Here's his comment, with a thought or two from me...
---------------
This is precisely why “never worship false idols” is such good advice.
I’m not Christian, before anyone starts quoting the Bible at me again, but I can see quite clearly that when culture swapped from worshipping divine and therefore perfect images, e.g. Gods, saints, angels etc, and went instead to worshipping human and therefore flawed creatures, e.g. celebrities, rich people, “hot” members of the opposite sex, everything went to hell.
Part of the social engineering plan of the last 50 years or so has been to scrap religion, and to instead idealise and worship sex, relationships and sexually attractive people, to the extent we are encouraged to see these things as almost mystical, transcendental. The overriding message we hear again and again and again is “hot woman + hot man + hot sex = astonishing transformational happiness.”
There is no longer any emphasis on aspiring to anything higher than base physicality. Man as a spiritual creature with higher ideals has been extinguished. We are taught to find our meaning and higher purpose through other, equally imperfect and flawed, human beings, and it doesn’t work.
What you say about the nature of women is more or less true. But then, men have morally questionable lusts too. Women may be attracted to violent men because violence connotes power, and men may be attracted to 15-year-old girls, because youth connotes fertility. Are either of these things morally impressive? No. But they’re just a fact of life, which make perfect sense from an evolutionary standpoint.
The fact human nature can often be base and amoral is really irrelevant. “Nature” is given too much credence where it comes to sex. So we’re attracted to unsuitable people, so what? It doesn’t mean we have to do anything about it. The whole point of civilization and of human intelligence is for people to control and channel natural impulses in a way that is most beneficial to them and to their families, society and culture, This represents what most cultures call morality. Living a moral life is and has always been recognised as hard and a struggle – if it were easy, all the major religions wouldn’t have spent so much time trying to control and enforce it.
This brings us to the vital crux of the situation we’re in now; our culture has become morally insane. We have stopped imposing moral limits on anyone’s behaviour, specifically their sexual behaviour, as this would be “oppressive” and “intolerant”. Instead, we practise and preach ‘safe sex’ – which basically means you can behave as immorally as you like, provided it is sterile and hygienic.
Nobody wants to accept that there is an important dimension to sexual behaviour above and beyond the physical ramifications. Nobody wants to confront the notion that doing whatever you like sexually is not okay and is profoundly destructive, even if you don’t get syphilis or an unwanted kid.
Everyone is terrified of stating: “you shouldn’t do this because it’s wrong”. That’s why unfettered sexual licence shouldn’t exist; not because of unplanned pregnancies, not because of diseases, but because it’s wrong; and a first-class ticket to an unseamed and insane culture.
Ah, but to say that something is wrong is to be 'judgmental', and that's bad. Never mind the fact that those shouting the 'judgmental' epithet are being judgmental themselves! Ah, the hypocrisy of libtards never ceases to amaze me...
Other posters have suggested that men used to idealise women to enable them to commit and work hard to support the family. This is absolutely wrong. Men committed to women and supported families because it was widely recognised and understood as being the right thing to do, the moral thing to do. This is the same reason women committed. Plus, both sexes had to demonstrate the skills and practical applications to be a good spouse – a job and means to support a family if you were a man, and homemaking skills if you were a woman. Both parties had to be considered to be “of good character” by the other’s family. People couldn’t get married simply because they thought the other one was “hot” or because they were “in love”, as it is now. They had to prove themselves.
This is was the 'social contract' that once existed...
Can anyone honestly think men in the past never argued with their wives, never got annoyed with them, never lusted after anyone else, even after decades of marriage and several kids? Of course they did. Husbands and wives didn’t idealise each other; that is very much a modern invention, necessary after we scrapped religion and God. Any ancient text, be it religious, philosophical or whatever has elucidated again and again the imperfections of mankind and the imperfect ways in which the sexes relate. The point is to find the arrangements that work best.
As I said, the point isn’t what men and women’s “nature” may or may not be. The point is for society as a whole to set moral standards and expect people to adhere to them, with penalties if they don’t. We have given up setting any moral standards, therefore we have given up having a viable culture based on healthy relations between the sexes.
-----------------
I thought that was good stuff, so I shared it with my readers. Stay tuned; there are more posts on the way! Until next time...
MarkyMark
02 May 2013
An E-Mail I Received
Guys,
After spending a relaxing holiday weekend down in South Jersey with my late mother four years ago, I found this e-mail waiting for me. The writer, who I'll call Greg, said it was up to me what I did with his message, so I'm publishing it. The writer's name has been changed for reasons that will become apparent as you read it.
BTW, I am not unmarried because I am wise; I'm not. I'm unmarried solely by the grace of God. I WANTED to be married, but I was never that successful with women. They didn't ignore me, but I was never a threat to become the next Casanova, either. My present single status is more by God's grace than it is by any smarts I may or may not possess.
Without any further ado, let's read Greg's e-mail to me. You'll find it to be quite sobering and enlightening all at the same time...
--------------
Hi MarkyMark,
I am a long time lurker on your site and have read many of your comments and blog posts. I respect the fact that you have never been married and have no plans to do so and I wish I had been so wise. I am writing you to let you know what one man had to pay for freedom and hopefully share the true cost of same with you. It's up to you what you do with this story. Anyway as you probably get a lot of these I'll try to mark the highlights and skip a lot of the extraneous junk...
I'm a deadbeat dad!!! (light your torches - gasoline in 89, 91, and 95 octane is available in your choice of containers). Yep, I've got three kids and I'm behind on my child kidnapping payments by probably 10 grand at present and considerably more behind on alimony and her lawyer fees. I skipped the country rather than be jailed for all of the above compounding my crimes. A runaway slave is the worst kind of slave - one that absolutely refuses to serve his massa. My reasons were simple... if the state forces me not to be a father, then I will not pretend to be one. I will certainly not pay 75% of my take home pay to someone who hates me and actively tries to have me jailed every single day under threat of violence. Since I can't see my children anyway, it became a choice of not seeing them from jail or not seeing them from where I am now. The choice wasn't all that hard. It is my hope that as things get worse in the U.S. more men will make this move but the rest of the world is very unwelcoming to such as I and you take a great many risks that most men simply do not have the balls to take. Oh well. My only advice - have a job lined up and remember that working for peanuts in a third world country is better than living as a slave in a first world country.
Snippets of advice for those who jump ship:
*Most of the world doesn't even realize that county "family" court even exists much less the real implications of same. Your "civil" violations won't mean jack shit to places like Cambodia, Chile, Brazil, United Arab Emirates, Vietnam, Russia, China, etc. so shut up, stop whining, and live. The cops of Paraguay don't care your nation labels you a deadbeat.
*You won't be able to renew your passport so treat as you would your heart in a jar. If you lose it or it gets damaged you're dead, period.
*Women from around the world look better than anything back in the states, cost less unless you're totally stupid, and are much more easily disposed of.
*Before any man gets into a relationship with a woman in the U.S. have him travel to Manila, Pattaya, Rio, or someplace else for a full month. See the women there. Have several. It will change the way you view American women *forever*.
*Get a teaching certificate or such. CELTA, PGCE, or such so you can teach English. Whatever paper pushing job you do now won't be in demand in the third world country but your ability to speak English will be. If you are a tradesmen such as a plumber, electrician, etc. cheaper folk do your job so forget it - get the CELTA. If you are programmer who works from home - great - have the money you make target accounts in a foreign bank and work for a company abroad. If you can swing it somehow to make 1st world wages in a place like Thailand or Brazil you are king. If you are a pilot or professional diver - what the heck are doing living in the U.S.? Get out, live, earn all your money tax free, and expat already!!!
*Internalize "Who the fuck cares". Consider that your being jailed is inevitable (and it is as long as the United States is a living, breathing country). You'll get sick, you'll lose your passport, you'll run out of money, something. Internalize it, know it, and get over it. Freedom is in the mind and there are plenty of prisoners who walk around "free" every day of their lives and plenty of prisoners who are freer than them. Personally i'd rather be in jail than married to a American woman again.
--
"Freedom from servitude comes not from violent action, but from the refusal to serve. Tyrants fall when the people withdraw their support." - Boétie
--------------
Powerful stuff, wasn't it? I thought so, which is why I posted it. Until next time...
MarkyMark
After spending a relaxing holiday weekend down in South Jersey with my late mother four years ago, I found this e-mail waiting for me. The writer, who I'll call Greg, said it was up to me what I did with his message, so I'm publishing it. The writer's name has been changed for reasons that will become apparent as you read it.
BTW, I am not unmarried because I am wise; I'm not. I'm unmarried solely by the grace of God. I WANTED to be married, but I was never that successful with women. They didn't ignore me, but I was never a threat to become the next Casanova, either. My present single status is more by God's grace than it is by any smarts I may or may not possess.
Without any further ado, let's read Greg's e-mail to me. You'll find it to be quite sobering and enlightening all at the same time...
--------------
Hi MarkyMark,
I am a long time lurker on your site and have read many of your comments and blog posts. I respect the fact that you have never been married and have no plans to do so and I wish I had been so wise. I am writing you to let you know what one man had to pay for freedom and hopefully share the true cost of same with you. It's up to you what you do with this story. Anyway as you probably get a lot of these I'll try to mark the highlights and skip a lot of the extraneous junk...
I'm a deadbeat dad!!! (light your torches - gasoline in 89, 91, and 95 octane is available in your choice of containers). Yep, I've got three kids and I'm behind on my child kidnapping payments by probably 10 grand at present and considerably more behind on alimony and her lawyer fees. I skipped the country rather than be jailed for all of the above compounding my crimes. A runaway slave is the worst kind of slave - one that absolutely refuses to serve his massa. My reasons were simple... if the state forces me not to be a father, then I will not pretend to be one. I will certainly not pay 75% of my take home pay to someone who hates me and actively tries to have me jailed every single day under threat of violence. Since I can't see my children anyway, it became a choice of not seeing them from jail or not seeing them from where I am now. The choice wasn't all that hard. It is my hope that as things get worse in the U.S. more men will make this move but the rest of the world is very unwelcoming to such as I and you take a great many risks that most men simply do not have the balls to take. Oh well. My only advice - have a job lined up and remember that working for peanuts in a third world country is better than living as a slave in a first world country.
Snippets of advice for those who jump ship:
*Most of the world doesn't even realize that county "family" court even exists much less the real implications of same. Your "civil" violations won't mean jack shit to places like Cambodia, Chile, Brazil, United Arab Emirates, Vietnam, Russia, China, etc. so shut up, stop whining, and live. The cops of Paraguay don't care your nation labels you a deadbeat.
*You won't be able to renew your passport so treat as you would your heart in a jar. If you lose it or it gets damaged you're dead, period.
*Women from around the world look better than anything back in the states, cost less unless you're totally stupid, and are much more easily disposed of.
*Before any man gets into a relationship with a woman in the U.S. have him travel to Manila, Pattaya, Rio, or someplace else for a full month. See the women there. Have several. It will change the way you view American women *forever*.
*Get a teaching certificate or such. CELTA, PGCE, or such so you can teach English. Whatever paper pushing job you do now won't be in demand in the third world country but your ability to speak English will be. If you are a tradesmen such as a plumber, electrician, etc. cheaper folk do your job so forget it - get the CELTA. If you are programmer who works from home - great - have the money you make target accounts in a foreign bank and work for a company abroad. If you can swing it somehow to make 1st world wages in a place like Thailand or Brazil you are king. If you are a pilot or professional diver - what the heck are doing living in the U.S.? Get out, live, earn all your money tax free, and expat already!!!
*Internalize "Who the fuck cares". Consider that your being jailed is inevitable (and it is as long as the United States is a living, breathing country). You'll get sick, you'll lose your passport, you'll run out of money, something. Internalize it, know it, and get over it. Freedom is in the mind and there are plenty of prisoners who walk around "free" every day of their lives and plenty of prisoners who are freer than them. Personally i'd rather be in jail than married to a American woman again.
--
"Freedom from servitude comes not from violent action, but from the refusal to serve. Tyrants fall when the people withdraw their support." - Boétie
--------------
Powerful stuff, wasn't it? I thought so, which is why I posted it. Until next time...
MarkyMark
01 May 2013
Chris in Oregon on Older Women
Guys,
Chris in Oregon left this comment in response to an old post. Actually, it was three comments, thanks to Blogger's new limit on comment length; he wrote it in three parts. Anyway, it was so good that I'm posting it here...
---------------
Actually, I just read the entire article, and have a few thoughts, none of which are particularly earth-shattering. I just feel like pontificating, as the weather is nightmarishly hot this week, and there ain't no goin' outside for me.
This is so like women. They are so self-obsessed, they can't see down the road and ponder the consequences of their actions. They only care about their own personal gratification, not realizing that they might be the one's who are the losers in the long run by rejecting traditional family.
I hear the pain in this woman's voice, so to speak, but still, it's all "me, me, me, I want, I want, I want...."
Tough bananas, baby. Life ain't all roses, and we all make choices. Now, I've made choices in life, most good, some not so good. But, I live with the consequences of my choices, and don't whine about it. It is what it is.
A woman, on the other hand, is not prepared to accept responsibility for the decisions she has made. She wants someone to magically make it better. She foolishly waited to try and have kids until she was an OLD HAG, then wonders why it won't work.
Uh, duh!
Leave some eggs in your refrigerator for twenty years, and you'll understand the problem. Simple lesson: EGGS WILL ROT OVER TIME!
Here is a well-educated professional woman who doesn't understand this basic fact? I know women have been sold a bill of goods, but how dumb can you get?
Face it: Nature doesn't want CRUSTY OLD WOMEN having children! Basic biology, folks, and I'm no expert on biology. It's just common sense! Nature wants a woman around long enough to care for her off-spring, and she can't very well do that properly if she's spending her time having bypass surgery, cleaning her dentures, and sorting through her wrinkles!
Old women were not designed to breed!
Old women are supposed to be.....old women. Crabby old women. Ugly old women. Nasssssty old tobacco-chewin' women.
She has forgotten her place in life. She missed her opportunity, and now she regrets it. Suck it up, sister! A woman should be done spewing out babies by the time she is thirty, and no later. By forty, a woman is OLD! Look around you. Look at the forty-year-old women you see every day. See any of them you want to screw? Any of them? Didn't think so. (Blow-jobs aren't good either- their dentures might lock up on your weinie! Imagine THAT 911 call!)
Dude, you cracked me up with that one!!
Nature makes women BUTT UGLY fairly early in life to prevent them from breeding. Kind of hard to get pregnant if you're so gruesome no man in his right mind can get a boner over your appearance. But, women, in their arrogance, fail to realize that men are stimulated VISUALLY!
If you look like an old hag, then the penis just naturally will NOT stand to attention. You've got to have some sort of good looks to get our motors running, ladies, and if you look like a bag of wrinkly cellulite, then you had better face it- no one wants you! Contrary to the lie feminists have been telling you, fifty is NOT the new thirty! A fifty-year-old woman has less sex appeal than a sheep. (Ask anyone in Montana.)
What is it about Montana people & sheep, eh? That's like the second time you've said that...
I am constantly amazed at the post-forty women that have come on to me lately. Give me a break! Do they think I'm blind?
Ick!
There is truly nothing more preposterous, pathetic and downright sickening than an old woman who is trying to be seductive.
Ick, ick, ick!
There ought to be a law against such behavior!
I don't know. This is an issue my bachelor friends and I discuss quite occasionally. Old women trying to seduce us, that is. It gives us no end of amusement. I've got women in their fifties and sixties trying to flirt with me. Regularly. I can understand a woman in the transitional stage of thirty-five trying this behavior. She doesn't quite realize that her looks are all but gone, and is still trying the same old tactics. By forty, she should know better.
Look in the bloody mirror! If you can find one wide enough, that is. A woman of forty is not sexual in any sense of the word. She is useless for breeding, and her sex appeal is GONE! Why have women fallen for the lie that they remain sexual into their sixties and seventies? They are NOT! They are putrid, smelly shells of their former selves! Nothing more! By that age, a woman looks like the package her body once came in. All sagging, wrinkly and disgusting!
I'm in good shape physically, but I'm not twenty. I have no problem with this. I don't expect to have the strength, looks or virility I had when I was young. I'm realistic. I don't expect pretty eighteen-year-old girls to find me attractive, unless I win the lottery. (Then, of course, my looks will amazingly rebound overnight! Kinda' like a magic tonic, or something, those lottery tickets!)
It's amazing how money makes you look better to women, isn't it?
I've got this one broad, an antique dealer I know, who has the hots for me. About 60-65 years old. Nice enough lady, as far as that goes. I'm sure she was hot back in, I don't know....the Korean War? She just doesn't get it. I could rattle off dozens of these old crows that have tried to nail me. This is nothing new. I had these old broads bothering me when I was twenty! Seriously! If you just have to get laid, and you can close your eyes, and hold your breath (pew!), there is no easier lay than an old woman. They are so desperate. So pathetic. So easy.
So gross.
Christopher in Oregon
---------------
Chris, my man, thanks so much for leaving that funny, insightful comment. That was good, funny stuff! Until next time...
MarkyMark
Chris in Oregon left this comment in response to an old post. Actually, it was three comments, thanks to Blogger's new limit on comment length; he wrote it in three parts. Anyway, it was so good that I'm posting it here...
---------------
Actually, I just read the entire article, and have a few thoughts, none of which are particularly earth-shattering. I just feel like pontificating, as the weather is nightmarishly hot this week, and there ain't no goin' outside for me.
This is so like women. They are so self-obsessed, they can't see down the road and ponder the consequences of their actions. They only care about their own personal gratification, not realizing that they might be the one's who are the losers in the long run by rejecting traditional family.
I hear the pain in this woman's voice, so to speak, but still, it's all "me, me, me, I want, I want, I want...."
Tough bananas, baby. Life ain't all roses, and we all make choices. Now, I've made choices in life, most good, some not so good. But, I live with the consequences of my choices, and don't whine about it. It is what it is.
A woman, on the other hand, is not prepared to accept responsibility for the decisions she has made. She wants someone to magically make it better. She foolishly waited to try and have kids until she was an OLD HAG, then wonders why it won't work.
Uh, duh!
Leave some eggs in your refrigerator for twenty years, and you'll understand the problem. Simple lesson: EGGS WILL ROT OVER TIME!
Here is a well-educated professional woman who doesn't understand this basic fact? I know women have been sold a bill of goods, but how dumb can you get?
Face it: Nature doesn't want CRUSTY OLD WOMEN having children! Basic biology, folks, and I'm no expert on biology. It's just common sense! Nature wants a woman around long enough to care for her off-spring, and she can't very well do that properly if she's spending her time having bypass surgery, cleaning her dentures, and sorting through her wrinkles!
Old women were not designed to breed!
Old women are supposed to be.....old women. Crabby old women. Ugly old women. Nasssssty old tobacco-chewin' women.
She has forgotten her place in life. She missed her opportunity, and now she regrets it. Suck it up, sister! A woman should be done spewing out babies by the time she is thirty, and no later. By forty, a woman is OLD! Look around you. Look at the forty-year-old women you see every day. See any of them you want to screw? Any of them? Didn't think so. (Blow-jobs aren't good either- their dentures might lock up on your weinie! Imagine THAT 911 call!)
Dude, you cracked me up with that one!!
Nature makes women BUTT UGLY fairly early in life to prevent them from breeding. Kind of hard to get pregnant if you're so gruesome no man in his right mind can get a boner over your appearance. But, women, in their arrogance, fail to realize that men are stimulated VISUALLY!
If you look like an old hag, then the penis just naturally will NOT stand to attention. You've got to have some sort of good looks to get our motors running, ladies, and if you look like a bag of wrinkly cellulite, then you had better face it- no one wants you! Contrary to the lie feminists have been telling you, fifty is NOT the new thirty! A fifty-year-old woman has less sex appeal than a sheep. (Ask anyone in Montana.)
What is it about Montana people & sheep, eh? That's like the second time you've said that...
I am constantly amazed at the post-forty women that have come on to me lately. Give me a break! Do they think I'm blind?
Ick!
There is truly nothing more preposterous, pathetic and downright sickening than an old woman who is trying to be seductive.
Ick, ick, ick!
There ought to be a law against such behavior!
I don't know. This is an issue my bachelor friends and I discuss quite occasionally. Old women trying to seduce us, that is. It gives us no end of amusement. I've got women in their fifties and sixties trying to flirt with me. Regularly. I can understand a woman in the transitional stage of thirty-five trying this behavior. She doesn't quite realize that her looks are all but gone, and is still trying the same old tactics. By forty, she should know better.
Look in the bloody mirror! If you can find one wide enough, that is. A woman of forty is not sexual in any sense of the word. She is useless for breeding, and her sex appeal is GONE! Why have women fallen for the lie that they remain sexual into their sixties and seventies? They are NOT! They are putrid, smelly shells of their former selves! Nothing more! By that age, a woman looks like the package her body once came in. All sagging, wrinkly and disgusting!
I'm in good shape physically, but I'm not twenty. I have no problem with this. I don't expect to have the strength, looks or virility I had when I was young. I'm realistic. I don't expect pretty eighteen-year-old girls to find me attractive, unless I win the lottery. (Then, of course, my looks will amazingly rebound overnight! Kinda' like a magic tonic, or something, those lottery tickets!)
It's amazing how money makes you look better to women, isn't it?
I've got this one broad, an antique dealer I know, who has the hots for me. About 60-65 years old. Nice enough lady, as far as that goes. I'm sure she was hot back in, I don't know....the Korean War? She just doesn't get it. I could rattle off dozens of these old crows that have tried to nail me. This is nothing new. I had these old broads bothering me when I was twenty! Seriously! If you just have to get laid, and you can close your eyes, and hold your breath (pew!), there is no easier lay than an old woman. They are so desperate. So pathetic. So easy.
So gross.
Christopher in Oregon
---------------
Chris, my man, thanks so much for leaving that funny, insightful comment. That was good, funny stuff! Until next time...
MarkyMark
30 April 2013
How I Unplugged
Guys,
I found yet another forum post, this one from 29 Apr 2006, that belongs on the blog. In it, I shared how I unplugged from the fematrix...
------------------
I found yet another forum post, this one from 29 Apr 2006, that belongs on the blog. In it, I shared how I unplugged from the fematrix...
------------------
Guys,
To answer in greater detail, for years I've known in my gut that something was wrong with relationships. For years, I knew something was screwed up. I just couldn't ARTICULATE it; I couldn't say why things were messed up.
Before I continue, let me say this: even though I use the word, 'stage', that is not to imply that the stages were all orderly & sequential. They were not; it would be more accurate to say that they overlapped in some cases. BTW, I didn't finish this process until I turned 43.
The first stage of my awakening was when I was in the Navy. When I traveled overseas, all I can say is wow! What a difference to see women who not only tolerate you, but like and appreciate you-in spite of having a 'Y' chromosome and a penis! Fred Reed has an article about AW and the chip they have; in it, he says that if you haven't been outside of America, you have NO IDEA what it's like to be around women who don't have the chip. Boy, is he right.
The second stage took many years. I was like Hambone, hoping to find a decent woman, and trying all the NG things that we know don't work. After my share of failed attempts, I threw in the towel.
The third stage occurred when I worked with women. I worked at a couple of the biggest companies in America doing office work. I also worked at small, local companies doing the same thing. I got exposed to many women, and I saw what they're REALLY like when they're not trying to impress or charm me. To say that I was disheartened by what I saw & heard would be an understatement! I saw how mean, shallow, hypocritical, and selfish 99.99% of all women are. It was truly a disappointment, akin to finding out that Santa Claus doesn't exist, but many times worse than that...
The fourth stage was seeing how married guys live-ugghh! The bitching, the honey-do lists, being forced to give up their passions (a classic muscle car, motorcycle, etc.), and other things just GRATED me. It was unfair, wrong, and I was not, nor am not, going to live that way. I LOVE my motorcycles, and I will not give them up for anybody! If I couldn't ride, a part of me would die. Allowing someone to amputate me on a mental, emotional, and spiritual level is simply unacceptable to me.
The fifth stage occurred when I was falsely accused under the DV statutes. I'd dated a gal briefly; it didn't work out, and I thought that was that-but it wasn't. She began stalking me. She then accused me of doing it to her! When I'd tried to seek the help of the authorities, I didn't get the help I needed. Going to family court was something I'll NEVER forget! This was no kangaroo court, no sir; this was beyond that. A kangaroo court would have had some PRETENSE of fairness...
The final stage occured when found this site. I was new at my job in late '04. By now, I'd put the pieces together, but I thought I was one of the few, if only, men who'd seen the truth. I entered 'women suck', or 'American women suck', into Google. I found this site, and the rest, as they say, is history...
MarkyMark
To answer in greater detail, for years I've known in my gut that something was wrong with relationships. For years, I knew something was screwed up. I just couldn't ARTICULATE it; I couldn't say why things were messed up.
Before I continue, let me say this: even though I use the word, 'stage', that is not to imply that the stages were all orderly & sequential. They were not; it would be more accurate to say that they overlapped in some cases. BTW, I didn't finish this process until I turned 43.
The first stage of my awakening was when I was in the Navy. When I traveled overseas, all I can say is wow! What a difference to see women who not only tolerate you, but like and appreciate you-in spite of having a 'Y' chromosome and a penis! Fred Reed has an article about AW and the chip they have; in it, he says that if you haven't been outside of America, you have NO IDEA what it's like to be around women who don't have the chip. Boy, is he right.
The second stage took many years. I was like Hambone, hoping to find a decent woman, and trying all the NG things that we know don't work. After my share of failed attempts, I threw in the towel.
The third stage occurred when I worked with women. I worked at a couple of the biggest companies in America doing office work. I also worked at small, local companies doing the same thing. I got exposed to many women, and I saw what they're REALLY like when they're not trying to impress or charm me. To say that I was disheartened by what I saw & heard would be an understatement! I saw how mean, shallow, hypocritical, and selfish 99.99% of all women are. It was truly a disappointment, akin to finding out that Santa Claus doesn't exist, but many times worse than that...
The fourth stage was seeing how married guys live-ugghh! The bitching, the honey-do lists, being forced to give up their passions (a classic muscle car, motorcycle, etc.), and other things just GRATED me. It was unfair, wrong, and I was not, nor am not, going to live that way. I LOVE my motorcycles, and I will not give them up for anybody! If I couldn't ride, a part of me would die. Allowing someone to amputate me on a mental, emotional, and spiritual level is simply unacceptable to me.
The fifth stage occurred when I was falsely accused under the DV statutes. I'd dated a gal briefly; it didn't work out, and I thought that was that-but it wasn't. She began stalking me. She then accused me of doing it to her! When I'd tried to seek the help of the authorities, I didn't get the help I needed. Going to family court was something I'll NEVER forget! This was no kangaroo court, no sir; this was beyond that. A kangaroo court would have had some PRETENSE of fairness...
The final stage occured when found this site. I was new at my job in late '04. By now, I'd put the pieces together, but I thought I was one of the few, if only, men who'd seen the truth. I entered 'women suck', or 'American women suck', into Google. I found this site, and the rest, as they say, is history...
MarkyMark
29 April 2013
Sluts vs. Used Cars, by Mr. Stinky
Guys,
I was reading @ Happy Bachelors when I found THIS gem...
-------------------
Consider the following scenario:
A man walks into a car dealership to buy a vehicle and is greeted by a car salesman.
The potential buyer is shown around the floor and is given the chance to look at various models, is given their specifications, gets a chance to sit in a couple of the models and is even given the opportunity to test drive a couple of the vehicles.
The buyer selects two models and takes them both out on the road to see how the drive and to get a better feel for them.
After returning from the second test drive they both go into the car salesman’s office to discuss purchasing a vehicle.
One vehicle is a brand new 2013 model that has less than 5,000 clicks, no dents or scratches, in perfect working order, has all the bells and whistles and comes with a 5 year warranty. It costs $25,000.
The second vehicle is a used 2009 version or the same vehicle, has 130,000 clicks, has a dent in the bumper, less fuel efficient, doesn’t have a leather interior and only comes with a 3 year warranty. It too costs $25,000.
The buyer is perplexed.
“You want to sell me a vehicle that has 26 times the mileage, 2 years less on the warranty, a couple dents and is lacking some of the details I want in a car. Tell me again why I am paying the exact same price for it?”
“Well, because all cars a created equal” the car salesman retorts. “Who are you to scoff at the thought of getting less of what you want for your hard earned money. Who are you to impose your societal expectations and social conditions on this vehicle? You’re obviously projecting! You’re obviously not a real man! You and your double standards make me sick”
“Well if I’m spending my hard earned money on something – I want to get what I want. I don’t want a subpar vehicle with more mileage, more dents and less of a warranty. And who are you to tell me what I should like? Who are you to tell me what is valuable? Who are you to try and impose your capitalistic expectations on me? I’ll buy whatever vehicle I see fit!”
Society (on the whole) is the used car salesman.
A slut is a used vehicle -- or maybe more aptly a used-up vehicle -- and society is attempting to sell it to you for the same price as a new vehicle.
A car that has been driven around the block a few times really isn’t a big deal. A car that has driven across the country – twice – is much less desirable if you are spending the same amount of money to purchase it.
Society – particularly feminists -- wants you to believe:
= = > Used cars (sluts) are as good as new cars.
= = > Used cars (sluts) should cost the same as new cars.
= = > There is no intrinsic difference between the two.
= = > A used car (sluts) have the same market value as a new car (female who has had only a couple sexual partners)
Now before you get your knickers in a knot – I am not saying women/sluts are only as valuable as cars. I understand NAWALT but it seems in this day and age sluts are the rule, not the exception.
If you’re spending your heard earned money (commitment) and you want to ensure you’re getting the most bang for your buck – no pun intended -- why would men value something that has been through the ringer over something that is brand new or gently used?
The problem is that the vast majority of modern women have been ridden hard; they've spent much of their lives on the cock carousel. They are truly used up...
In fact, human beings desire brand new things over used things. Apart from things that are considered collectibles -- 99.9% of the time the value for something used goes down -- not up.
-----------------
Mr. Stinky NAILS it! That is truly good stuff. Have a good day now...
MarkyMark
I was reading @ Happy Bachelors when I found THIS gem...
-------------------
Consider the following scenario:
A man walks into a car dealership to buy a vehicle and is greeted by a car salesman.
The potential buyer is shown around the floor and is given the chance to look at various models, is given their specifications, gets a chance to sit in a couple of the models and is even given the opportunity to test drive a couple of the vehicles.
The buyer selects two models and takes them both out on the road to see how the drive and to get a better feel for them.
After returning from the second test drive they both go into the car salesman’s office to discuss purchasing a vehicle.
One vehicle is a brand new 2013 model that has less than 5,000 clicks, no dents or scratches, in perfect working order, has all the bells and whistles and comes with a 5 year warranty. It costs $25,000.
The second vehicle is a used 2009 version or the same vehicle, has 130,000 clicks, has a dent in the bumper, less fuel efficient, doesn’t have a leather interior and only comes with a 3 year warranty. It too costs $25,000.
The buyer is perplexed.
“You want to sell me a vehicle that has 26 times the mileage, 2 years less on the warranty, a couple dents and is lacking some of the details I want in a car. Tell me again why I am paying the exact same price for it?”
“Well, because all cars a created equal” the car salesman retorts. “Who are you to scoff at the thought of getting less of what you want for your hard earned money. Who are you to impose your societal expectations and social conditions on this vehicle? You’re obviously projecting! You’re obviously not a real man! You and your double standards make me sick”
“Well if I’m spending my hard earned money on something – I want to get what I want. I don’t want a subpar vehicle with more mileage, more dents and less of a warranty. And who are you to tell me what I should like? Who are you to tell me what is valuable? Who are you to try and impose your capitalistic expectations on me? I’ll buy whatever vehicle I see fit!”
Society (on the whole) is the used car salesman.
A slut is a used vehicle -- or maybe more aptly a used-up vehicle -- and society is attempting to sell it to you for the same price as a new vehicle.
A car that has been driven around the block a few times really isn’t a big deal. A car that has driven across the country – twice – is much less desirable if you are spending the same amount of money to purchase it.
Society – particularly feminists -- wants you to believe:
= = > Used cars (sluts) are as good as new cars.
= = > Used cars (sluts) should cost the same as new cars.
= = > There is no intrinsic difference between the two.
= = > A used car (sluts) have the same market value as a new car (female who has had only a couple sexual partners)
Now before you get your knickers in a knot – I am not saying women/sluts are only as valuable as cars. I understand NAWALT but it seems in this day and age sluts are the rule, not the exception.
If you’re spending your heard earned money (commitment) and you want to ensure you’re getting the most bang for your buck – no pun intended -- why would men value something that has been through the ringer over something that is brand new or gently used?
The problem is that the vast majority of modern women have been ridden hard; they've spent much of their lives on the cock carousel. They are truly used up...
In fact, human beings desire brand new things over used things. Apart from things that are considered collectibles -- 99.9% of the time the value for something used goes down -- not up.
-----------------
Mr. Stinky NAILS it! That is truly good stuff. Have a good day now...
MarkyMark
28 April 2013
Yet Another Good, MGTOW Blog
Guys,
Over the weekend, I spent time on Happy Bachelors, a place I've been remiss in visiting as of late. While there, I found out about a great, new MGTOW blog called Off the Plantation. Check it out; you'll be glad you did! Good day for now...
MarkyMark
Over the weekend, I spent time on Happy Bachelors, a place I've been remiss in visiting as of late. While there, I found out about a great, new MGTOW blog called Off the Plantation. Check it out; you'll be glad you did! Good day for now...
MarkyMark
An Ancient Greek Quote about Marriage
Guys,
Someone on the F*cked Company thread about marriage posted a link to what the Ancient Greeks had to say about women & holy matrimony. While I'll be posting more of these in the near future, I thought I'd whet your appetite with a quick, quotable quote:
Sounds like the man KNEW what he was talking about. Fellas, if you value your life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness, then you will NOT get married! Until next time...
MarkyMark
Someone on the F*cked Company thread about marriage posted a link to what the Ancient Greeks had to say about women & holy matrimony. While I'll be posting more of these in the near future, I thought I'd whet your appetite with a quick, quotable quote:
Hipponax, On Women, c. 580 BCE
Two happy days a woman brings a man: the first, when he marries her; the second, when he bears her to the grave.
Sounds like the man KNEW what he was talking about. Fellas, if you value your life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness, then you will NOT get married! Until next time...
MarkyMark
Six Reasons to Never Date Single Mothers
Guys,
I was reading through the Don't Marry Archives when I found this gem you're about to read. As always, I added my commentary free of charge... ;)
---------------
6 Reasons to NEVER date a Single Mother
Post by Older Bachelor on Dec 13, 2004, 7:40pm
Single mothers. Well, here are MY issues with them (This pertains to a woman who had a kid and never married, or divorced her husband because “She wasn’t happy”. If she had a good marriage and he died, there might be wiggle room, but I still wouldn’t date her).
1: She decided to have a kid without a husband. This demonstrates terrible, selfish values. It also shows that she thinks of men as sperm donors and child support payers, NOT husbands & fathers. What will happen if you knock her up? Get ready to pay up for a kid that you won’t get to be a real dad to.
That alone is bad enough! At the very least, a single mom shows lack of good judgement; otherwise she wouldn't have had sex with a man with whom she was unwilling to have children. They say that, unless you're willing to have CHILDREN with the person (after all, they are a byproduct of the sex act), then you should NOT have sex with the person.
2: In some states, you can be responsible for child support by just living with her. I don’t want to pay for kids that aren’t mine. Do you?
If you spend enough time with the kid and form a bond with him/her, the law may consider you a 'father figure', and therefore responsible for helping (i.e. pay de facto alimony) to 'raise' the kid.
3: False allegations of child abuse. It isn’t likely, but I don’t want to take that chance. Getting branded with a big “M” on your forehead (For Molester) will WRECK YOUR LIFE. It will never go away. Too big a risk.
What more can I add to that?
4: Relationship aren’t easy as it is. Add a minor child and it really complicates the issue. Do you want to deal with her kid(s) too? You won’t be their dad and they will know it. Their mom already fucked
up their life by not having a dad for them, and is fucking it up more by bringing in “Revolving door boyfriends” into their life.
Man, isn't THAT the truth?!
5: Lots of single moms have financial problems. You will be obligated to help pay for sitters, food, braces, on and on. For children that aren’t yours. Get the credit card out!
I seldom get the credit card out for me; why in blazes would I get it out for some bitch and her womb turds-especially when said womb turds aren't even mine?!
6: There is NO reason to date one. Millions of women in this country are single with no kids, and in every age range. Go younger if you have to. Don’t waste your time with a woman that has PROVEN that she doesn’t want a husband for her and dad for her kids. Do you think she will change her mind for you? That she will forget her utter contempt for husbands and fathers just for you? Sure she will.
I run into single mothers once in a while, and when “I have a kid” is revealed, that’s the end of the conversation for me. I will be polite but I will still walk off, because I don’t want anything to do with them. And neither will any other smart man.
I don't know about this; this may be true, but I haven't seen many single, childless women my age or even close to it. Perhaps I'm looking in the wrong places? I was a member of a couple of dating sites, and it seems as if the vast majority of women on there have kids. Maybe that's why they're on dating sites in the first place? I don't know. All I do know is that, once you get past the early 20s women, that the vast majority of the ones I've met, seen, and know have kids.
Having said that, I agree that the smart man will NOT want to have anything to do with a single mom-not for a relationship anyway. Perhaps a pump-n-dump or two are okay, but a relationship with a single mom is out of the question.
---------------
I thought that was good, necessary reading. My boys out there will encounter single motners; when they do, they need to know what to do-hit the 'Eject' button! This piece gives them sound reasons for doing so. Until next time...
MarkyMark
I was reading through the Don't Marry Archives when I found this gem you're about to read. As always, I added my commentary free of charge... ;)
---------------
6 Reasons to NEVER date a Single Mother
Post by Older Bachelor on Dec 13, 2004, 7:40pm
Single mothers. Well, here are MY issues with them (This pertains to a woman who had a kid and never married, or divorced her husband because “She wasn’t happy”. If she had a good marriage and he died, there might be wiggle room, but I still wouldn’t date her).
1: She decided to have a kid without a husband. This demonstrates terrible, selfish values. It also shows that she thinks of men as sperm donors and child support payers, NOT husbands & fathers. What will happen if you knock her up? Get ready to pay up for a kid that you won’t get to be a real dad to.
That alone is bad enough! At the very least, a single mom shows lack of good judgement; otherwise she wouldn't have had sex with a man with whom she was unwilling to have children. They say that, unless you're willing to have CHILDREN with the person (after all, they are a byproduct of the sex act), then you should NOT have sex with the person.
2: In some states, you can be responsible for child support by just living with her. I don’t want to pay for kids that aren’t mine. Do you?
If you spend enough time with the kid and form a bond with him/her, the law may consider you a 'father figure', and therefore responsible for helping (i.e. pay de facto alimony) to 'raise' the kid.
3: False allegations of child abuse. It isn’t likely, but I don’t want to take that chance. Getting branded with a big “M” on your forehead (For Molester) will WRECK YOUR LIFE. It will never go away. Too big a risk.
What more can I add to that?
4: Relationship aren’t easy as it is. Add a minor child and it really complicates the issue. Do you want to deal with her kid(s) too? You won’t be their dad and they will know it. Their mom already fucked
up their life by not having a dad for them, and is fucking it up more by bringing in “Revolving door boyfriends” into their life.
Man, isn't THAT the truth?!
5: Lots of single moms have financial problems. You will be obligated to help pay for sitters, food, braces, on and on. For children that aren’t yours. Get the credit card out!
I seldom get the credit card out for me; why in blazes would I get it out for some bitch and her womb turds-especially when said womb turds aren't even mine?!
6: There is NO reason to date one. Millions of women in this country are single with no kids, and in every age range. Go younger if you have to. Don’t waste your time with a woman that has PROVEN that she doesn’t want a husband for her and dad for her kids. Do you think she will change her mind for you? That she will forget her utter contempt for husbands and fathers just for you? Sure she will.
I run into single mothers once in a while, and when “I have a kid” is revealed, that’s the end of the conversation for me. I will be polite but I will still walk off, because I don’t want anything to do with them. And neither will any other smart man.
I don't know about this; this may be true, but I haven't seen many single, childless women my age or even close to it. Perhaps I'm looking in the wrong places? I was a member of a couple of dating sites, and it seems as if the vast majority of women on there have kids. Maybe that's why they're on dating sites in the first place? I don't know. All I do know is that, once you get past the early 20s women, that the vast majority of the ones I've met, seen, and know have kids.
Having said that, I agree that the smart man will NOT want to have anything to do with a single mom-not for a relationship anyway. Perhaps a pump-n-dump or two are okay, but a relationship with a single mom is out of the question.
---------------
I thought that was good, necessary reading. My boys out there will encounter single motners; when they do, they need to know what to do-hit the 'Eject' button! This piece gives them sound reasons for doing so. Until next time...
MarkyMark
27 April 2013
Where Have All The Ladies Gone?
Guys,
I saw this piece on townhall.com, and I just HAD to comment on it! Stand by for my commentary and analysis...
-------------------
As our society abandons the conservative values that make women into ladies, women with grace and dignity have become an endangered species—especially on today’s college campuses. The kind of woman who inspired Tom Jones’ song “She’s a Lady” has become an antiquated figure from America’s past. Most popular songs about women today are more like “Youse a Ho” by Ludacris.
Ladies have become an endangered species? How 'bout trying all but extinct! Yeah, there are a few ladies out there, but they're so rare that they make gold look as plentiful as sand on a beach. Furthermore, those few ladies out there are taken anyway. No modern guy has a prayer of finding a traditional woman who will love and care for her man-not a prayer!
As for Lucacris' song, "Youse a Ho", it seems to me that he's speaking the truth about what's out there. Women are whores! Look at how they dress, act, and talk. Sheesh, they'd make a sailor blush! I ought to know; I was a sailor. Seems to me that Ludacris, Two Live Crew, and other rappers know the REAL DEAL on women. People don't like the message because it's blunt and true...
I am often surprised by the social behavior of certain young women who call themselves conservative. Conservatism is not just an ideology; it is a lifestyle. On college campuses telling the difference between liberal and conservative women is nearly impossible when they behave in an equally undignified manner. Conservative women should display their values through their lifestyle. This means acting like ladies, because the difference between conservative and liberal women should not just be the way we vote.
It's like I often say: good women do little or nothing to distinguish themselves from bad women. Ergo, from where I sit, I have to assume that all women are bad. Sadly, I'll most likely be right.
The feminist
movement’s war on conservatism in America has killed chivalry and
trained too many women to think and act like men. As a result, many
young conservative women do not know what it means to be a lady. Here is
a good definition: A
lady does not tell dirty jokes along with men and she does not tolerate
men telling dirty jokes in her presence. She does not swear, and she is
not considered “one of the guys.” In spite of new fashion trends, a lady
always dresses appropriately, leaving a lot to the imagination. When at
a social gathering, a lady does not do things she will regret the next
day. Above all, a lady is well-mannered, dignified, gracious, and kind.
Feminism didn't kill chivalry; you women who BOUGHT IN to feminism killed chivalry! Let's get it right, shall we? Though feminism had sponsorship from the Elites of the world, it wouldn't have gotten anywhere if women didn't BUY IN to it. You women bought in to feminism; you women blamed us for oppressing you and demaning you with chivalry; so, we stopped treating you like ladies-duh! Then again, in order to treat a woman like a lady, she has to BE one in the first place...
Oh, and as for women acting like men, why couldn't they have acted like GENTELMEN, hmmm? I was just wonering...
As for your list of what make a lady, let me say this: even using your modest list, you've disqualified almost ALL American women! If not for a true lady I see at work, I would be hard pressed to tell you the last time I saw one; I'm serious! Furthermore, if I go back a decade or so, I could count the number of bona fide ladies I've met and known on one hand, and still have fingers left.
Our society holds conservatives to a higher moral standard. When a woman acts like a lady she gains the respect both of men and other women. Besides, why would a conservative woman ever want to be mistaken for a liberal woman?
I don't know; you tell me.
I
have heard many of my male peers place women into three categories:
“the ones to mess around with, the ones to date, and the ones to marry.”
Though this is a rather crude way of categorizing women, it shows that
men do recognize and value the qualities that make a woman a lady.
Ladies are the kind of women that men can take home to Mom and Dad and
that most men want to marry. Being considered “marriage material” is an
indicator that a woman is to be respected; most men who deem a woman as
such treat her with the utmost respect. For men, ladies are at the top
of the female totem pole, and conservative women need to take pride in
the fact that they are worthy of time, love, and commitment.
Darlin', I have to correct you; there are only TWO categories of women: those you mess with, and those you date-period. No, let me change that; there are women you mess with, and women you avoid-end of story. There is no dating, because chicks just want to hook up nowadays; you ask a modern girl on a date, she'll look at you like you have two heads! As for women who are 'marriage material', there are no marriageable women in America nowadays. Even if there were, no thinking man will marry them. The divorce laws and family courts make that a rather foolish propostion for a man. Ergo, one cannot have a category for women one would marry.
It is important for a conservative woman to be a lady both in the real world and on the internet. In our social-network-obsessed society, all it takes is a single compromising picture to ruin one’s social and professional reputations. It has become commonplace for young women’s Facebook profiles to be littered with pictures of themselves scantily clad in compromising situations, partying, inebriated, and even kissing other girls. Party girls are a dime a dozen and these profiles damage reputations far more than they help them. A conservative woman should be conservative at all times, especially when the cameras are rolling.
These profiles don't just damage reputations; they EXPOSE them. Oh, how can you tell a conservative woman on "Girls Gone Wild"? When she flips up her top, she exposes her bra, not her bare boobs-ha!
Lately, young women have taken to denigrating themselves and each other as “sluts” and “hos.” When women playfully call each other these things they make it okay for men to do it too. Much like the way Eve Ensler and her Vagina Monologues “reclaimed” the c-word, women on college campuses are reclaiming “slut.” I have seen many young women sporting “slut” backpack patches, and drinking from party cups with “slut” scribbled across the side. “Reclaiming” demeaning words does not empower women, and it certainly does not dilute their original meaning. With all of these self-proclaimed “sluts” on college campuses, conservative women should refrain from partaking in this trend and insist on calling themselves, and acting, like ladies.
When women call each other bitches, sluts, and whores, they're only telling the truth about themselves. When a woman has one of the aforementioned words on her backpack, she's telling me ahead of time what kind of person she is. Thanks to her advertising, I know who to stay away from. Conversely, if a guy does get involved with her, it's only for a pump & dump, which is all such a woman is good for; after all, she had 'whore' emblazoned on her shirt or backpack, right?
As a teenager when I left my parents’ house to go out with friends, the last thing my dad always told me was, “Act like a lady!” At the time, I saw those parting words as a lack of trust, but I now recognize that his words were meant to be in the back of my head the whole night—and they always were. My dad no longer has to remind me to act like a lady whenever I am out; his words are engraved in my heart and mind and constantly keep me in check. It is about time that somebody told all conservative young women to “act like ladies."
The only problem is that many girls no longer have fathers. Thanks to her mother divorcing her dad and kicking him out of the house (thanks to the help of Big Brother Government), most girls no longer have fathers to exhort & admonish them to act like ladies. Who's going to tell her to act like a lady? Her despicable whore of a mom? Come on!
-------------------
That concludes my analysis of this piece. I didn't do a very good job today; I wasn't on top of my game at all. I'll try to do better next time...
MarkyMark
I saw this piece on townhall.com, and I just HAD to comment on it! Stand by for my commentary and analysis...
-------------------
As our society abandons the conservative values that make women into ladies, women with grace and dignity have become an endangered species—especially on today’s college campuses. The kind of woman who inspired Tom Jones’ song “She’s a Lady” has become an antiquated figure from America’s past. Most popular songs about women today are more like “Youse a Ho” by Ludacris.
Ladies have become an endangered species? How 'bout trying all but extinct! Yeah, there are a few ladies out there, but they're so rare that they make gold look as plentiful as sand on a beach. Furthermore, those few ladies out there are taken anyway. No modern guy has a prayer of finding a traditional woman who will love and care for her man-not a prayer!
As for Lucacris' song, "Youse a Ho", it seems to me that he's speaking the truth about what's out there. Women are whores! Look at how they dress, act, and talk. Sheesh, they'd make a sailor blush! I ought to know; I was a sailor. Seems to me that Ludacris, Two Live Crew, and other rappers know the REAL DEAL on women. People don't like the message because it's blunt and true...
I am often surprised by the social behavior of certain young women who call themselves conservative. Conservatism is not just an ideology; it is a lifestyle. On college campuses telling the difference between liberal and conservative women is nearly impossible when they behave in an equally undignified manner. Conservative women should display their values through their lifestyle. This means acting like ladies, because the difference between conservative and liberal women should not just be the way we vote.
It's like I often say: good women do little or nothing to distinguish themselves from bad women. Ergo, from where I sit, I have to assume that all women are bad. Sadly, I'll most likely be right.
Feminism didn't kill chivalry; you women who BOUGHT IN to feminism killed chivalry! Let's get it right, shall we? Though feminism had sponsorship from the Elites of the world, it wouldn't have gotten anywhere if women didn't BUY IN to it. You women bought in to feminism; you women blamed us for oppressing you and demaning you with chivalry; so, we stopped treating you like ladies-duh! Then again, in order to treat a woman like a lady, she has to BE one in the first place...
Oh, and as for women acting like men, why couldn't they have acted like GENTELMEN, hmmm? I was just wonering...
As for your list of what make a lady, let me say this: even using your modest list, you've disqualified almost ALL American women! If not for a true lady I see at work, I would be hard pressed to tell you the last time I saw one; I'm serious! Furthermore, if I go back a decade or so, I could count the number of bona fide ladies I've met and known on one hand, and still have fingers left.
Our society holds conservatives to a higher moral standard. When a woman acts like a lady she gains the respect both of men and other women. Besides, why would a conservative woman ever want to be mistaken for a liberal woman?
I don't know; you tell me.
Darlin', I have to correct you; there are only TWO categories of women: those you mess with, and those you date-period. No, let me change that; there are women you mess with, and women you avoid-end of story. There is no dating, because chicks just want to hook up nowadays; you ask a modern girl on a date, she'll look at you like you have two heads! As for women who are 'marriage material', there are no marriageable women in America nowadays. Even if there were, no thinking man will marry them. The divorce laws and family courts make that a rather foolish propostion for a man. Ergo, one cannot have a category for women one would marry.
It is important for a conservative woman to be a lady both in the real world and on the internet. In our social-network-obsessed society, all it takes is a single compromising picture to ruin one’s social and professional reputations. It has become commonplace for young women’s Facebook profiles to be littered with pictures of themselves scantily clad in compromising situations, partying, inebriated, and even kissing other girls. Party girls are a dime a dozen and these profiles damage reputations far more than they help them. A conservative woman should be conservative at all times, especially when the cameras are rolling.
These profiles don't just damage reputations; they EXPOSE them. Oh, how can you tell a conservative woman on "Girls Gone Wild"? When she flips up her top, she exposes her bra, not her bare boobs-ha!
Lately, young women have taken to denigrating themselves and each other as “sluts” and “hos.” When women playfully call each other these things they make it okay for men to do it too. Much like the way Eve Ensler and her Vagina Monologues “reclaimed” the c-word, women on college campuses are reclaiming “slut.” I have seen many young women sporting “slut” backpack patches, and drinking from party cups with “slut” scribbled across the side. “Reclaiming” demeaning words does not empower women, and it certainly does not dilute their original meaning. With all of these self-proclaimed “sluts” on college campuses, conservative women should refrain from partaking in this trend and insist on calling themselves, and acting, like ladies.
When women call each other bitches, sluts, and whores, they're only telling the truth about themselves. When a woman has one of the aforementioned words on her backpack, she's telling me ahead of time what kind of person she is. Thanks to her advertising, I know who to stay away from. Conversely, if a guy does get involved with her, it's only for a pump & dump, which is all such a woman is good for; after all, she had 'whore' emblazoned on her shirt or backpack, right?
As a teenager when I left my parents’ house to go out with friends, the last thing my dad always told me was, “Act like a lady!” At the time, I saw those parting words as a lack of trust, but I now recognize that his words were meant to be in the back of my head the whole night—and they always were. My dad no longer has to remind me to act like a lady whenever I am out; his words are engraved in my heart and mind and constantly keep me in check. It is about time that somebody told all conservative young women to “act like ladies."
The only problem is that many girls no longer have fathers. Thanks to her mother divorcing her dad and kicking him out of the house (thanks to the help of Big Brother Government), most girls no longer have fathers to exhort & admonish them to act like ladies. Who's going to tell her to act like a lady? Her despicable whore of a mom? Come on!
-------------------
That concludes my analysis of this piece. I didn't do a very good job today; I wasn't on top of my game at all. I'll try to do better next time...
MarkyMark
Delusional Single Mom Slut on Craigslist
Guys,
I originally wrote this three years ago. I saw this posted on Happy Bachelors, and I thought it could stand for some of my unique commentary, commentary that only Yours Truly can give. Here's a deluded, single mom slut asking for the moon-how typical...
---------------
If you look at her pics, she's not a bad looking gal; she's kinda cute, actually. However, as one who grew up on the Jersey Shore; as one who has traveled the world in Uncle Sam's Navy; I know what REAL beautiful women look like, amen? Hint: this gal is NOT one of them! However, that doesn't stop her from being a deluded, mentally ill slut, does it?
You're a divorced mother of 4?! Damn, you didn't waste time pumping out those little annuities, did you, Darlin'?! I feel sorry for your poor ex; he'll NEVER be able to have a life again-not with all that CS money you're getting!
You're looking for a relationship?! Oh, please! One, you probably ditched a perfectly good man for a lame reason. Two, all you're GOOD for is a one night stand! Why would a man have a relationship with you after you've been all used up?! If a guy were to bang you, he'd need to strap a 2x4 across his ass to keep himself from falling in! After four kids, your twat has to be a mile wide by now...
How's about you enjoy satisfying a man, Darlin'?! Yeah, I can picture you in a country bar. Do you have illicit liaisons in the bathroom too?
A little lady like you will be eaten alive in the classroom. My mother, a retired teacher, told my brother and me this: I don't care WHAT you do; don't become a teacher! Become a garbage man; become a stripper; do ANYTHING but teach! Today, you have to function as a cop, while having none of the power thereof. This is especially true in the big cities, where the classes are full of single mom born and raised thuglets.
Translation: I'm looking for a bad boy/sucker combination. I want a guy to be sucker, so he'll raise my fatherless children. I want a bad boy to get my panties wet. I want it all, Baby!
And notice how this woman, like many of them, want a man who's taller than them? Yet these are the same women who will decry any man who has the temerity to want a woman who's well endowed in the breast department! Waaaaahhh, you're objectifying women-waaaaaaahhhh! WTF are you doing when you demand a guy taller than you, huh? At least you chicks can get your breasts augmented! It's a little more difficult to add height to someone, you know? The medical community hasn't figured out a way to add vertebrae, spinal cord, and other minor things like that...
You want intelligence?! Yeah, right! You wouldn't know intelligence if it bit you in the ass, Darlin'! Being a single mom slut, you show no intelligence whatsoever!
Seriously though, this chick is freakin' deluded. She wants a guy who 'loves kids'-mainly someone else's! She wants a tall guy. She wants a guy who's 'dominant', but not too much so. She wants a good looking guy who likes doing all these expensive activities; keeping horses is NOT cheap! Oh, and she doesn't want a guy over 32.
Darlin', you're deluded! If a guy is employed, has decent breath, is breathing, has a pulse, has a dick, and can get an erection, you should probably check him out. You should be grateful that any guy pays you any attention whatsoever! What's sad is that this single mom slut will still get tons of replies, thanks to the pussy cartel.
And to think I was bummed out over the fact that a divorced, single mom @ work (the lovely and gracious Maria) rejected me. Maria isn't young like this gal is, nor is she as cute as this gal is. At least she only has one kid; she does't have four like this slut does! I have to wonder, WTF was I thinking?! Is THIS what I was missing out on?! If so, then I'm not missing out on anything at all! I should thank my lucky stars that I got turned down. Until next time...
MarkyMark
I originally wrote this three years ago. I saw this posted on Happy Bachelors, and I thought it could stand for some of my unique commentary, commentary that only Yours Truly can give. Here's a deluded, single mom slut asking for the moon-how typical...
---------------
I am 24 years old, 5"6 and 130-lbs.
If you look at her pics, she's not a bad looking gal; she's kinda cute, actually. However, as one who grew up on the Jersey Shore; as one who has traveled the world in Uncle Sam's Navy; I know what REAL beautiful women look like, amen? Hint: this gal is NOT one of them! However, that doesn't stop her from being a deluded, mentally ill slut, does it?
I am a divorced mother of 4 (no, its not a typo) and am looking for friends/dating/LTR (no one night stands, please).
You're a divorced mother of 4?! Damn, you didn't waste time pumping out those little annuities, did you, Darlin'?! I feel sorry for your poor ex; he'll NEVER be able to have a life again-not with all that CS money you're getting!
You're looking for a relationship?! Oh, please! One, you probably ditched a perfectly good man for a lame reason. Two, all you're GOOD for is a one night stand! Why would a man have a relationship with you after you've been all used up?! If a guy were to bang you, he'd need to strap a 2x4 across his ass to keep himself from falling in! After four kids, your twat has to be a mile wide by now...
I
enjoy spending time with family and friends, hanging out at home,
horseback riding, country bars, coffee shops (even though I rarely drink
it haha), picnics, etc.
How's about you enjoy satisfying a man, Darlin'?! Yeah, I can picture you in a country bar. Do you have illicit liaisons in the bathroom too?
I am currently going to school to become a teacher and I also train dogs on the side.
A little lady like you will be eaten alive in the classroom. My mother, a retired teacher, told my brother and me this: I don't care WHAT you do; don't become a teacher! Become a garbage man; become a stripper; do ANYTHING but teach! Today, you have to function as a cop, while having none of the power thereof. This is especially true in the big cities, where the classes are full of single mom born and raised thuglets.
I
am looking for a guy who is comfortable around children, not allergic
to dogs (I have one), and is at least a few inches taller than me and
has more of a dominant personality.
Translation: I'm looking for a bad boy/sucker combination. I want a guy to be sucker, so he'll raise my fatherless children. I want a bad boy to get my panties wet. I want it all, Baby!
And notice how this woman, like many of them, want a man who's taller than them? Yet these are the same women who will decry any man who has the temerity to want a woman who's well endowed in the breast department! Waaaaahhh, you're objectifying women-waaaaaaahhhh! WTF are you doing when you demand a guy taller than you, huh? At least you chicks can get your breasts augmented! It's a little more difficult to add height to someone, you know? The medical community hasn't figured out a way to add vertebrae, spinal cord, and other minor things like that...
I am
attracted mostly to intelligence. If you think we might be a match,
email me with a picture included please! My age limit is 32.
You want intelligence?! Yeah, right! You wouldn't know intelligence if it bit you in the ass, Darlin'! Being a single mom slut, you show no intelligence whatsoever!
Seriously though, this chick is freakin' deluded. She wants a guy who 'loves kids'-mainly someone else's! She wants a tall guy. She wants a guy who's 'dominant', but not too much so. She wants a good looking guy who likes doing all these expensive activities; keeping horses is NOT cheap! Oh, and she doesn't want a guy over 32.
Darlin', you're deluded! If a guy is employed, has decent breath, is breathing, has a pulse, has a dick, and can get an erection, you should probably check him out. You should be grateful that any guy pays you any attention whatsoever! What's sad is that this single mom slut will still get tons of replies, thanks to the pussy cartel.
And to think I was bummed out over the fact that a divorced, single mom @ work (the lovely and gracious Maria) rejected me. Maria isn't young like this gal is, nor is she as cute as this gal is. At least she only has one kid; she does't have four like this slut does! I have to wonder, WTF was I thinking?! Is THIS what I was missing out on?! If so, then I'm not missing out on anything at all! I should thank my lucky stars that I got turned down. Until next time...
MarkyMark
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
